Tulsi Gabbard Accuses Obama Administration of Treasonous Conspiracy Against Trump

Focus Keyword: Tulsi Gabbard allegations

In a stunning revelation, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has leveled serious allegations against former President Barack Obama and senior officials from his administration. Gabbard is accusing them of orchestrating a “treasonous conspiracy” aimed at undermining President Trump during and after the controversial 2016 presidential election.

Background of the Allegations

On a recent broadcast of Fox News, Gabbard discussed her claims, which are supported by a newly declassified report. This report spans over 100 pages and includes a variety of emails, memos, and other records that purportedly provide “overwhelming evidence” of the conspiracy she accuses Obama’s officials of executing.

Key Points from Gabbard’s Claims

• Intelligence Community Assessment: Gabbard refers to internal findings that indicate Russia lacked the means and intent to alter the election’s outcome. The report mentions:

  • “Foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks.”
• Statements from the Obama Administration: Throughout late 2016, the Obama administration sought to build a narrative surrounding Russian interference, despite possessing intelligence contradicting this assertion. For example:
  • On December 7, 2016, former DNI James Clapper’s office stated that “foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. Presidential election outcome.”
  • A public statement from the Department of Homeland Security emphasized that altering actual ballot counts or results through cyber means would be exceedingly challenging.

Allegations of Manipulated Intelligence

Gabbard alleges that Obama officials intentionally suppressed crucial findings to further their agenda, claiming they “manufactured and politicized intelligence” as part of a “years-long coup” against Donald Trump.

Withholding of Evidence

• Gabbard asserts that internal assessments were deliberately concealed, and that FBI Director James Comey’s office dissented from original conclusions based on unspecified new guidance.
• Further complicating matters, Clapper reportedly compiled an alternative intelligence report framing Russia as responsible for the hacking of Democratic National Committee emails, which were later released by Wikileaks.

Implications and Consequences

The alleged actions led to a substantial inquiry headed by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller, costing taxpayers nearly $40 million. Gabbard reflects on the repercussions:

• Congressional impeachments against Trump
• Increased tensions between the U.S. and Russia
• Investigations that extended to senior Trump administration members

The Steele Dossier

Gabbard also touches on the controversial Steele dossier, a central piece of the Russia collusion narrative that has since been debunked. Notably, it was deemed “not credible” by elements within the intelligence community yet still utilized in official discourse.

Call for Accountability

In a recent statement, Gabbard emphasized the significance of her findings:

“This issue is not partisan but concerns every American. The truth must be exposed, and accountability should follow.”

Steps for Further Action

Gabbard has referred the documents to the Department of Justice, urging for a thorough investigation into the alleged conspiracy. She insists that every individual involved should face prosecution:

• “No matter how powerful, those responsible must be investigated.”
• “The integrity of our democratic republic depends on it.”

Conclusion

The allegations put forth by Tulsi Gabbard have raised significant questions concerning the actions of high-level officials during one of the most contentious election periods in recent U.S. history. As investigations progress, the implications of these claims could resonate deeply within the political landscape.

For more information about the 2016 presidential election and ongoing investigations, you can visit reliable sources like the U.S. Department of Justice and other reputable news outlets covering these developments.